
Core Ultra 7 268V
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 7 268V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +29.0% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 28W, a 11W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics 140V, while Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $450 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
2025Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 268V across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,469 vs 19,698).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌64.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 17W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 268V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 7 268V
2024Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +29.0% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 28W, a 11W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics 140V, while Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $450 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 268V across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,469 vs 19,698).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌64.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 17W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 268V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 268V better than Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 268V | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 85 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 268V | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 268V | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 492 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 492 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 403 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 492 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 492 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 468 FPS | 340 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 492 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 462 FPS | 337 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 230 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 268V | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 492 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 492 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 487 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 492 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 492 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 487 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 492 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 418 FPS | 363 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 268V and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340

Core Ultra 7 268V
Core Ultra 7 268V
The Core Ultra 7 268V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,698 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,469 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 268V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 7 268V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 268V versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 268V (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 268V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 uses Krackan Point (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 268V scores 19,698 against the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340's 19,469 — a 1.2% lead for the Core Ultra 7 268V. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 268V vs 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 268V | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+4% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+10% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core)+150% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-25% | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Lunar Lake (2024) | Krackan Point (2025) |
| PassMark | 19,698+1% | 19,469 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 10,653 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,437 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 268V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 268V | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-8533 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 268V) / not specified (Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340). The Core Ultra 7 268V includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics 140V), while the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 268V targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 268V rivals Core Ultra 7 155H.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 268V | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Arc Graphics 140V | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 7 268V launched at $450 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($450 vs $0), the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is $450 cheaper.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 268V | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.8 | — |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











