Core Ultra 7 268V
VS
Ryzen 5 8640HS

Core Ultra 7 268V vs Ryzen 5 8640HS

Intel

Core Ultra 7 268V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 5 GHz2024
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 8640HS

6 Cores12 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 268V

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
104%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
102%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
100%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
99%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
96%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
95%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
92%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core Ultra 7 268V leads in gaming performance. However, the Ryzen 5 8640HS is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore Ultra 7 268VRyzen 5 8640HS
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore Ultra 7 268VRyzen 5 8640HS
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 268V and Ryzen 5 8640HS

Intel

Core Ultra 7 268V

The Core Ultra 7 268V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,698 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 5 8640HS

The Ryzen 5 8640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,851 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 268V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 8640HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 7 268V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 268V versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640HS — a 2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 268V (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 268V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 5 8640HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 268V scores 19,698 against the Ryzen 5 8640HS's 19,851 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 8640HS. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 268V vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640HS.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 268VRyzen 5 8640HS
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
5 GHz+2%
4.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.5 GHz+59%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
2.5 MB (per core)+150%
1 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm-25%
4 nm
Architecture
Lunar Lake (2024)
Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
PassMark
19,698
19,851
Cinebench R23 Multi
10,653
Geekbench 6 Single
2,437
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 268V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 8640HS uses FP8 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 268VRyzen 5 8640HS
Socket
FCBGA2833
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x-8533
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 268V) / not specified (Ryzen 5 8640HS). The Core Ultra 7 268V includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics 140V), while the Ryzen 5 8640HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 268V targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 268V rivals Core Ultra 7 155H.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 268VRyzen 5 8640HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Arc Graphics 140V
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Productivity