Core Ultra 7 268V vs Ryzen 5 8640HS

Core Ultra 7 268V vs Ryzen 5 8640HS Performance Spectrum

Core Ultra 7 268V

8 / 8

19,698

0.0%

19,851

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 7 268V vs Ryzen 5 8640HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 7 268V vs Ryzen 5 8640HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 7 268V

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 28W, a 11W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics 140V, while Ryzen 5 8640HS needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (19,698 vs 19,851).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $450 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Ryzen 5 8640HS

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌64.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 17W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 268V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 268V better than Ryzen 5 8640HS?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core Ultra 7 268V is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 8640HS pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Ryzen 5 8640HS also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 8640HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 7 268V is the better buy right now. Core Ultra 7 268V comes in at an unclear MSRP at $450 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Ryzen 5 8640HS is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (43.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 7 268V makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 7 268V vs Ryzen 5 8640HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 7 268V

The Core Ultra 7 268V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,698 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 5 8640HS

The Ryzen 5 8640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,851 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 268V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 8640HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 7 268V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 268V versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640HS — a 2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 268V (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 268V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 5 8640HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 268V scores 19,698 against the Ryzen 5 8640HS's 19,851 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 8640HS. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 268V vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640HS.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 268V	Ryzen 5 8640HS
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	5 GHz+2%	4.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3.5 GHz+59%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	2.5 MB (per core)+150%	1 MB (per core)
Process	3 nm-25%	4 nm
Architecture	Lunar Lake (2024)	Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
PassMark	19,698	19,851
Cinebench R23 Multi	10,653	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,437	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 268V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 8640HS uses FP8 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 268V	Ryzen 5 8640HS
Socket	FCBGA2833	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5x-8533	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 268V) / not specified (Ryzen 5 8640HS). The Core Ultra 7 268V includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics 140V), while the Ryzen 5 8640HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 268V targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 268V rivals Core Ultra 7 155H.