Core Ultra 7 256V
VS
Core Ultra 7 268V

Core Ultra 7 256V vs Core Ultra 7 268V

Intel

Core Ultra 7 256V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 268V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 5 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 256V

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
105%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
102%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
101%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
100%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
97%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
96%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
92%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 268V

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
104%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
102%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
100%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
99%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
96%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
95%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
92%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core Ultra 7 256V leads in gaming performance. However, the Core Ultra 7 268V is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore Ultra 7 256VCore Ultra 7 268V
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($350)
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: The Core Ultra 7 256V leads not only in performance but also in value. It is effectively 13% cheaper ($350 vs $400) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore Ultra 7 256VCore Ultra 7 268V
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+14%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($350)
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 256V and Core Ultra 7 268V

Intel

Core Ultra 7 256V

The Core Ultra 7 256V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,579 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 268V

The Core Ultra 7 268V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,698 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

Both the Core Ultra 7 256V and Core Ultra 7 268V share an identical 8-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 256V versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 268V — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 268V (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). Both are built on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture using a 3 nm process. In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 256V scores 19,579 against the Core Ultra 7 268V's 19,698 — a 0.6% lead for the Core Ultra 7 268V. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 10,065 vs 10,653 (5.7% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 268V). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,658 vs 2,437, a 8.7% lead for the Core Ultra 7 256V that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,000 vs 10,000 (9.5% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 256V). Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 256VCore Ultra 7 268V
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
8 / 8
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz
5 GHz+4%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2.5 MB (per core)
2.5 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm
3 nm
Architecture
Lunar Lake (2024)
Lunar Lake (2024)
PassMark
19,579
19,698
Cinebench R23 Multi
10,065
10,653+6%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,658+9%
2,437
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,000+10%
10,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA2833 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x 8533 MT/s on the Core Ultra 7 256V versus LPDDR5x-8533 on the Core Ultra 7 268V — the Core Ultra 7 256V supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 7 268V supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 8 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 256V) and SoC (Core Ultra 7 268V).

FeatureCore Ultra 7 256VCore Ultra 7 268V
Socket
FCBGA2833
FCBGA2833
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x 8533 MT/s
LPDDR5x-8533
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core Ultra 7 256V) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 268V). Both include integrated graphics Intel Arc Graphics 140V (Core Ultra 7 256V) and Arc Graphics 140V (Core Ultra 7 268V) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 256V targets Mobile, Core Ultra 7 268V targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 268V rivals Core Ultra 7 155H.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 256VCore Ultra 7 268V
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mobile
Productivity
💰

Value Analysis

The Core Ultra 7 256V launched at $450 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 7 268V debuted at $450. At current prices ($350 vs $400), the Core Ultra 7 256V is $50 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 256V delivers 55.9 pts/$ vs 49.2 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 268V — making the Core Ultra 7 256V the 12.7% better value option.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 256VCore Ultra 7 268V
MSRP
$450
$450
Avg Price (30d)
$350-13%
$400
Performance per Dollar
55.9+14%
49.2
Release Date
2024
2024