Core Ultra 7 256V
VS
Ryzen 5 PRO 230

Core Ultra 7 256V vs Ryzen 5 PRO 230

Intel

Core Ultra 7 256V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 230

6 Cores12 Thrd6 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 256V

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
105%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
102%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
101%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
100%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
97%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
96%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
92%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 PRO 230

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
108%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
102%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
91%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core Ultra 7 256V leads in gaming performance. However, the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore Ultra 7 256VRyzen 5 PRO 230
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($350)
More affordable ($150)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 leads not only in performance but also in value. It is effectively 57% cheaper ($150 vs $350) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore Ultra 7 256VRyzen 5 PRO 230
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+135%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($350)
More affordable ($150)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 256V and Ryzen 5 PRO 230

Intel

Core Ultra 7 256V

The Core Ultra 7 256V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,579 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 230

The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,702 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 256V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 7 256V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 256V versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 256V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 256V scores 19,579 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 230's 19,702 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 230. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,658 vs 2,320, a 13.6% lead for the Core Ultra 7 256V that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,000 vs 7,210 (41.6% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 256V). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 256V vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 256VRyzen 5 PRO 230
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz
4.9 GHz+2%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.5 GHz+59%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB+33%
L2 Cache
2.5 MB (per core)
6 MB+140%
Process
3 nm-25%
4 nm
Architecture
Lunar Lake (2024)
Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025)
PassMark
19,579
19,702
Cinebench R23 Multi
10,065
Geekbench 6 Single
2,658+15%
2,320
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,000+53%
7,210
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 256V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 uses FP7/FP7r2/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x 8533 MT/s on the Core Ultra 7 256V versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 — the Core Ultra 7 256V supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Core Ultra 7 256V) vs 20 (Ryzen 5 PRO 230) — the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 256V) and Socket FP7 (Ryzen 5 PRO 230).

FeatureCore Ultra 7 256VRyzen 5 PRO 230
Socket
FCBGA2833
FP7/FP7r2/FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x 8533 MT/s
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
256 GB+1500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
20+150%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core Ultra 7 256V) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen 5 PRO 230). Both include integrated graphics Intel Arc Graphics 140V (Core Ultra 7 256V) and Radeon 760M (Ryzen 5 PRO 230) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 256V targets Mobile.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 256VRyzen 5 PRO 230
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Radeon 760M
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
true
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Target Use
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

The Core Ultra 7 256V launched at $450 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 debuted at $150. At current prices ($350 vs $150), the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is $200 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 256V delivers 55.9 pts/$ vs 131.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 — making the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 the 80.5% better value option.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 256VRyzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP
$450
$150-67%
Avg Price (30d)
$350
$150-57%
Performance per Dollar
55.9
131.3+135%
Release Date
2024
2025