Core Ultra 7 256V
VS
Ryzen 7 5800HS

Core Ultra 7 256V vs Ryzen 7 5800HS

Intel

Core Ultra 7 256V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 5800HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 256V

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
105%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
102%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
101%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
100%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
97%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
96%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
92%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 5800HS

#141
Ryzen 7 5800HS
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#144
Core i7-12650H
MSRP: $457|Avg: N/A
98%
#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core Ultra 7 256V delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Ryzen 7 5800HS in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore Ultra 7 256VRyzen 7 5800HS
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($350)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore Ultra 7 256VRyzen 7 5800HS
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($350)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 256V and Ryzen 7 5800HS

Intel

Core Ultra 7 256V

The Core Ultra 7 256V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,579 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 7 5800HS

The Ryzen 7 5800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,512 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 256V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 5800HS's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 256V versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800HS — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 256V (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 256V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800HS uses Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 256V scores 19,579 against the Ryzen 7 5800HS's 19,512 — a 0.3% lead for the Core Ultra 7 256V. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 256V vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5800HS.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 256VRyzen 7 5800HS
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz+9%
4.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.8 GHz+27%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
2.5 MB (per core)+400%
512K (per core)
Process
3 nm-57%
7 nm
Architecture
Lunar Lake (2024)
Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)
PassMark
19,579
19,512
Cinebench R23 Multi
10,065
Geekbench 6 Single
2,658
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 256V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 256VRyzen 7 5800HS
Socket
FCBGA2833
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x 8533 MT/s
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core Ultra 7 256V) / not specified (Ryzen 7 5800HS). The Core Ultra 7 256V includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics 140V), while the Ryzen 7 5800HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 256V targets Mobile.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 256VRyzen 7 5800HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
Target Use
Mobile