
Core Ultra 7 268V

Ryzen 7 4700GE
Core Ultra 7 268V vs Ryzen 7 4700GE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 7 268V vs Ryzen 7 4700GE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 7 268V vs Ryzen 7 4700GE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 7 268V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 43.8 vs 65.7 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 4700GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 50.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 65.7 vs 43.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 268V across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,636 vs 19,698).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 268V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 268V better than Ryzen 7 4700GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 268V vs Ryzen 7 4700GE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 7 268V
The Core Ultra 7 268V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,698 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 4700GE
The Ryzen 7 4700GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,636 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 268V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 4700GE's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 268V versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 4700GE — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 268V (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 268V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 4700GE uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 268V scores 19,698 against the Ryzen 7 4700GE's 19,636 — a 0.3% lead for the Core Ultra 7 268V. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 268V vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 7 4700GE.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 268V | Ryzen 7 4700GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+16% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz+41% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core)+400% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Lunar Lake (2024) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 19,698 | 19,636 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 10,653 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,437 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 268V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 4700GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 268V | Ryzen 7 4700GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-8533 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 268V) / not specified (Ryzen 7 4700GE). The Core Ultra 7 268V includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics 140V), while the Ryzen 7 4700GE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 268V targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 268V rivals Core Ultra 7 155H.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 268V | Ryzen 7 4700GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Arc Graphics 140V | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core Ultra 7 268V was priced at $450, while the Ryzen 7 4700GE came in at $299. On launch pricing ($450 vs $299), Ryzen 7 4700GE was $151 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 268V delivers 43.8 pts/$ vs 65.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 4700GE — making the Ryzen 7 4700GE the 40% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 268V | Ryzen 7 4700GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | $299-34% |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.8 | 65.7+50% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













