Ryzen AI 7 350
VS
Core Ultra 7 155H

Ryzen AI 7 350 vs Core Ultra 7 155H

AMD

Ryzen AI 7 350

8 Cores16 Thrd28 WWMax: 5 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 155H

16 Cores22 Thrd0 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 155H

#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
107%
#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
102%
#69
Core Ultra 7 155H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
98%
#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
95%
#83
Core i7-13700HX
MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Ryzen AI 7 350 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core Ultra 7 155H in both compute-intensive tasks (0.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightRyzen AI 7 350Core Ultra 7 155H
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Krackan Point (2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Meteor Lake-H (2023) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen AI 7 350Core Ultra 7 155H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI 7 350 and Core Ultra 7 155H

AMD

Ryzen AI 7 350

The Ryzen AI 7 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,897 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 155H

The Core Ultra 7 155H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,705 points. Launch price was $503.

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI 7 350 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 155H offers 16 cores / 22 threads — the Core Ultra 7 155H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 350 versus 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 155H — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 7 350 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen AI 7 350 uses the Krackan Point (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 155H uses Meteor Lake-H (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 24,897 against the Core Ultra 7 155H's 24,705 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen AI 7 350. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 350 vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 155H.

FeatureRyzen AI 7 350Core Ultra 7 155H
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
16 / 22+100%
Boost Clock
5 GHz+4%
4.8 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.8 GHz+90%
L3 Cache
8 MB
24 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
4 nm-43%
7 nm
Architecture
Krackan Point (2025)
Meteor Lake-H (2023)
PassMark
24,897
24,705
Cinebench R23 Multi
17,650
Geekbench 6 Single
2,384
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,433
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI 7 350 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 155H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen AI 7 350Core Ultra 7 155H
Socket
FP8
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
96 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen AI 7 350) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 155H). The Core Ultra 7 155H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)), while the Ryzen AI 7 350 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 155H targets Thin-and-light Performance / AI. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 155H rivals Ryzen 7 8840HS.

FeatureRyzen AI 7 350Core Ultra 7 155H
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Thin-and-light Performance / AI