Ryzen AI 7 350
VS
Xeon E5-2696 v4

Ryzen AI 7 350 vs Xeon E5-2696 v4

AMD

Ryzen AI 7 350

8 Cores16 Thrd28 WWMax: 5 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2696 v4

22 Cores44 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2696 v4

#41
Xeon W-2195
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
123%
#48
Xeon E5-2696 v4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#50
Xeon Gold 6238R
MSRP: $2612|Avg: N/A
96%
#54
EPYC 4465P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
83%
#55
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
MSRP: $229|Avg: $192
79%
#56
Xeon E5-4667 v3
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
79%
#59
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
MSRP: $409|Avg: $450
75%
#60
Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP: $599|Avg: $418
75%
#61
Xeon Platinum 8270
MSRP: $7405|Avg: N/A
75%
#62
EPYC 4464P
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
72%
#63
EPYC 4345P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
72%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen AI 7 350 (2025) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen AI 7 350Xeon E5-2696 v4
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Krackan Point (2025) / 4 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2696 v4 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen AI 7 350Xeon E5-2696 v4
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI 7 350 and Xeon E5-2696 v4

AMD

Ryzen AI 7 350

The Ryzen AI 7 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,897 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon E5-2696 v4

The Xeon E5-2696 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,938 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI 7 350 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2696 v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon E5-2696 v4 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 350 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2696 v4 — a 32.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 7 350 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen AI 7 350 uses the Krackan Point (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2696 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 24,897 against the Xeon E5-2696 v4's 24,938 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2696 v4. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 350 vs 55 MB on the Xeon E5-2696 v4.

FeatureRyzen AI 7 350Xeon E5-2696 v4
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
22 / 44+175%
Boost Clock
5 GHz+39%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache
8 MB
55 MB+588%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
5.5 MB+450%
Process
4 nm-71%
14 nm
Architecture
Krackan Point (2025)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
24,897
24,938
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI 7 350 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2696 v4 uses FCLGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen AI 7 350Xeon E5-2696 v4
Socket
FP8
FCLGA2011-3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0