Ryzen AI 7 350 vs Xeon E5-2696 v4

Ryzen AI 7 350 vs Xeon E5-2696 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen AI 7 350

8 / 16

24,897

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2696 v4

22 / 44

24,938

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen AI 7 350 vs Xeon E5-2696 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen AI 7 350 vs Xeon E5-2696 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen AI 7 350

2025

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 150W, a 122W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA2011-3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,897 vs 24,938).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 55 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2696 v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads.

Xeon E5-2696 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅+587.5% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads.

Trade-offs

❌435.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on FCLGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 7 350 moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 7 350 better than Xeon E5-2696 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2696 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen AI 7 350 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2696 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 22 cores and 44 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 587.5% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI 7 350 still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen AI 7 350 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 38.9% higher max boost clock.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 7 350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of FCLGA2011-3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen AI 7 350 vs Xeon E5-2696 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen AI 7 350

The Ryzen AI 7 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,897 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2696 v4

The Xeon E5-2696 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,938 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI 7 350 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2696 v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon E5-2696 v4 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 350 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2696 v4 — a 32.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 7 350 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen AI 7 350 uses the Krackan Point (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2696 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 24,897 against the Xeon E5-2696 v4's 24,938 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2696 v4. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 350 vs 55 MB on the Xeon E5-2696 v4.

Feature	Ryzen AI 7 350	Xeon E5-2696 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	22 / 44+175%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+39%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	8 MB	55 MB+588%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	5.5 MB+450%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Krackan Point (2025)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	24,897	24,938

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI 7 350 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2696 v4 uses FCLGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.