EPYC 7501 vs Ryzen AI 7 350

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7501 vs Ryzen AI 7 350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7501 vs Ryzen AI 7 350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7501

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+700% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.

Trade-offs

❌453.6% higher power demand at 155W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 7 350 moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen AI 7 350

2025

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 155W, a 127W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7501 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (24,897 vs 24,925).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7501, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7501 better than Ryzen AI 7 350?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7501 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen AI 7 350 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7501 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7501 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7501 still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 7501 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 7 350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of TR4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7501 vs Ryzen AI 7 350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7501

The EPYC 7501 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 24,925 points. Launch price was $3,400.

Ryzen AI 7 350

The Ryzen AI 7 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,897 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7501 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen AI 7 350 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7501 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7501 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 350 — a 50% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 7 350 (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7501 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen AI 7 350 uses Krackan Point (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7501 scores 24,925 against the Ryzen AI 7 350's 24,897 — a 0.1% lead for the EPYC 7501. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7501 vs 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 350.

Feature	EPYC 7501	Ryzen AI 7 350
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+300%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3 GHz	5 GHz+67%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+700%	8 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Krackan Point (2025)
PassMark	24,925	24,897

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7501 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 7 350 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.