EPYC 7501 vs Xeon W-1390P

EPYC 7501 vs Xeon W-1390P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7501

32 / 64

24,925

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon W-1390P

8 / 16

25,016

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7501 vs Xeon W-1390P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7501 vs Xeon W-1390P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7501

2017

Why buy it

✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,925 vs 25,016).
❌24% higher power demand at 155W vs 125W.

Xeon W-1390P

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 125W instead of 155W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $594 MSRP, while EPYC 7501 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-1390P better than EPYC 7501?

Yes. Xeon W-1390P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-1390P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-1390P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-1390P is the better buy right now. Xeon W-1390P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $594 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (42.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-1390P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 32/64. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7501 vs Xeon W-1390P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7501

The EPYC 7501 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 24,925 points. Launch price was $3,400.

Xeon W-1390P

The Xeon W-1390P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,016 points. Launch price was $539.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7501 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon W-1390P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7501 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7501 versus 5.2 GHz on the Xeon W-1390P — a 53.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1390P (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 7501 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-1390P uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7501 scores 24,925 against the Xeon W-1390P's 25,016 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon W-1390P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7501 vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1390P.

Feature	EPYC 7501	Xeon W-1390P
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+300%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3 GHz	5.2 GHz+73%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.5 GHz+75%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+300%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark	24,925	25,016

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7501 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1390P uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.