EPYC 7351P vs EPYC 7501

EPYC 7351P vs EPYC 7501 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7351P

16 / 32

24,871

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

EPYC 7501

32 / 64

24,925

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7351P vs EPYC 7501 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7351P vs EPYC 7501: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7351P

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,871 vs 24,925).

EPYC 7501

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7501 better than EPYC 7351P?

Yes. EPYC 7501 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7501 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7501 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7501 still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 7501 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7501 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7351P vs EPYC 7501 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7351P

The EPYC 7351P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 24,871 points. Launch price was $750.

EPYC 7501

The EPYC 7501 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 24,925 points. Launch price was $3,400.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7351P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 7501 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7501 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7351P versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 7501 — a 3.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 7501 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). Both are built on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 7351P scores 24,871 against the EPYC 7501's 24,925 — a 0.2% lead for the EPYC 7501. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 7351P	EPYC 7501
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	32 / 64+100%
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+20%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	64 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark	24,871	24,925