EPYC 7351P vs Xeon Gold 6143

EPYC 7351P vs Xeon Gold 6143 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7351P

16 / 32

24,871

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Gold 6143

16 / 32

24,786

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7351P vs Xeon Gold 6143 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7351P vs Xeon Gold 6143: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7351P

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+190.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Draws 155W instead of 205W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon Gold 6143

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,786 vs 24,871).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $342 MSRP, while EPYC 7351P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌32.3% higher power demand at 205W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7351P better than Xeon Gold 6143?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6143 is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7351P pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. EPYC 7351P also has the bigger cache pool with 190.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7351P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 190.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7351P is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 6143 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 7351P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $342 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6143 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Gold 6143 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (72.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7351P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 190.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 22 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7351P vs Xeon Gold 6143 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7351P

The EPYC 7351P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 24,871 points. Launch price was $750.

Xeon Gold 6143

The Xeon Gold 6143 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,786 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7351P and Xeon Gold 6143 share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7351P versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6143 — a 31.9% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6143 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 7351P is built on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 7351P scores 24,871 against the Xeon Gold 6143's 24,786 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 7351P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7351P vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6143.

Feature	EPYC 7351P	Xeon Gold 6143
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	4 GHz+38%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.8 GHz+17%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+191%	22 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	—
PassMark	24,871	24,786

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7351P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6143 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.