EPYC 7351P vs Xeon Gold 6240

EPYC 7351P vs Xeon Gold 6240 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7351P

16 / 32

24,871

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Gold 6240

18 / 36

24,918

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7351P vs Xeon Gold 6240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7351P vs Xeon Gold 6240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7351P

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+158.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,871 vs 24,918).

Xeon Gold 6240

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 150W instead of 155W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7351P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 64 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6240 better than EPYC 7351P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 7351P is ahead with a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6240 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. EPYC 7351P also has the bigger cache pool with 158.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6240 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6240 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 6240 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6240 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 18 cores / 36 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7351P vs Xeon Gold 6240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7351P

The EPYC 7351P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 24,871 points. Launch price was $750.

Xeon Gold 6240

The Xeon Gold 6240 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 18 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 24,918 points. Launch price was $2,445.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7351P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6240 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon Gold 6240 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7351P versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6240 — a 29.4% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 7351P uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6240 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7351P scores 24,871 against the Xeon Gold 6240's 24,918 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 6240. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7351P vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6240.

Feature	EPYC 7351P	Xeon Gold 6240
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	18 / 36+13%
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.9 GHz+34%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.6 GHz+8%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+159%	24.75 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+2744%	18 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	24,871	24,918

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7351P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6240 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.