EPYC 7272 vs EPYC 7501

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7272

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 120W instead of 155W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).

EPYC 7501

2017

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7272 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (24,925 vs 25,161).
❌29.2% higher power demand at 155W vs 120W.

EPYC 7272

2019

EPYC 7501

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 120W instead of 155W, a 35W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7272 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (24,925 vs 25,161).
❌29.2% higher power demand at 155W vs 120W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7272 better than EPYC 7501?

Yes. EPYC 7272 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 3.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7272 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 3.2% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7272 is the better fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7272 still looks like the safer overall buy. EPYC 7272 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7272 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 32/64. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7272 Benchmark Check

EPYC 7501 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7272	EPYC 7501
1080p
low	148 FPS	187 FPS
medium	121 FPS	165 FPS
high	103 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	105 FPS
1440p
low	129 FPS	153 FPS
medium	103 FPS	127 FPS
high	84 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	71 FPS
medium	53 FPS	63 FPS
high	42 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	39 FPS

Open EPYC 7272 Open EPYC 7501

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7272	EPYC 7501
1080p
low	354 FPS	207 FPS
medium	312 FPS	188 FPS
high	261 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	131 FPS
1440p
low	300 FPS	178 FPS
medium	274 FPS	163 FPS
high	234 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	188 FPS	111 FPS
4K
low	194 FPS	112 FPS
medium	178 FPS	103 FPS
high	153 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	123 FPS	75 FPS

Open EPYC 7272 Open EPYC 7501

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7272	EPYC 7501
1080p
low	625 FPS	620 FPS
medium	509 FPS	518 FPS
high	453 FPS	466 FPS
ultra	398 FPS	399 FPS
1440p
low	487 FPS	517 FPS
medium	396 FPS	432 FPS
high	347 FPS	378 FPS
ultra	300 FPS	325 FPS
4K
low	363 FPS	383 FPS
medium	282 FPS	308 FPS
high	241 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	220 FPS

Open EPYC 7272 Open EPYC 7501

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7272	EPYC 7501
1080p
low	629 FPS	623 FPS
medium	629 FPS	623 FPS
high	616 FPS	623 FPS
ultra	540 FPS	561 FPS
1440p
low	624 FPS	623 FPS
medium	548 FPS	584 FPS
high	472 FPS	500 FPS
ultra	403 FPS	420 FPS
4K
low	426 FPS	475 FPS
medium	386 FPS	427 FPS
high	345 FPS	375 FPS
ultra	298 FPS	320 FPS

Open EPYC 7272 Open EPYC 7501

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7272 and EPYC 7501

EPYC 7272

The EPYC 7272 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,161 points. Launch price was $625.

EPYC 7501

The EPYC 7501 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 24,925 points. Launch price was $3,400.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7272 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 7501 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7501 has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7272 versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 7501 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 7272 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7272 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the EPYC 7501 uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7272 scores 25,161 against the EPYC 7501's 24,925 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 7272. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7272 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7501.

Feature	EPYC 7272	EPYC 7501
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	32 / 64+167%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+7%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+45%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark	25,161	24,925