EPYC 7272 vs EPYC 7501

EPYC 7272 vs EPYC 7501 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7272

12 / 24

25,161

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

EPYC 7501

32 / 64

24,925

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7272 vs EPYC 7501 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7272 vs EPYC 7501: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7272

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 120W instead of 155W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7501 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).

EPYC 7501

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,925 vs 25,161).
❌29.2% higher power demand at 155W vs 120W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7272 better than EPYC 7501?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 7501 is ahead with a 13.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7272 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark. EPYC 7501 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7272 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7272 still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 7272 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7272 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 32/64. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7272 vs EPYC 7501 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7272

The EPYC 7272 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,161 points. Launch price was $625.

EPYC 7501

The EPYC 7501 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 24,925 points. Launch price was $3,400.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7272 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 7501 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7501 has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7272 versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 7501 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 7272 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7272 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the EPYC 7501 uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7272 scores 25,161 against the EPYC 7501's 24,925 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 7272. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7272 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7501.

Feature	EPYC 7272	EPYC 7501
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	32 / 64+167%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+7%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+45%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark	25,161	24,925