EPYC 7272 vs Xeon W-1390P

EPYC 7272 vs Xeon W-1390P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7272

12 / 24

25,161

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon W-1390P

8 / 16

25,016

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7272 vs Xeon W-1390P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7272 vs Xeon W-1390P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7272

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Draws 120W instead of 125W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-1390P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon W-1390P

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (25,016 vs 25,161).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $594 MSRP, while EPYC 7272 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-1390P better than EPYC 7272?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-1390P is ahead with a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7272 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. EPYC 7272 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7272 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-1390P is the better buy right now. Xeon W-1390P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $594 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7272 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (42.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-1390P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7272 vs Xeon W-1390P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7272

The EPYC 7272 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,161 points. Launch price was $625.

Xeon W-1390P

The Xeon W-1390P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,016 points. Launch price was $539.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7272 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-1390P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7272 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7272 versus 5.2 GHz on the Xeon W-1390P — a 47.6% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1390P (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 7272 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon W-1390P uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7272 scores 25,161 against the Xeon W-1390P's 25,016 — a 0.6% lead for the EPYC 7272. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7272 vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1390P.

Feature	EPYC 7272	Xeon W-1390P
Cores / Threads	12 / 24+50%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	5.2 GHz+63%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.5 GHz+21%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+100%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark	25,161	25,016

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7272 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1390P uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.