EPYC 7272 vs Ryzen 7 8840HS

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7272 vs Ryzen 7 8840HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7272 vs Ryzen 7 8840HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7272

2019

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌328.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen 7 8840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +33.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 120W, a 92W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (25,156 vs 25,161).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7272, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 8840HS better than EPYC 7272?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7272 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 8840HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7272 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 8840HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 7 8840HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 33.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 8840HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7272 vs Ryzen 7 8840HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7272

The EPYC 7272 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,161 points. Launch price was $625.

Ryzen 7 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,156 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7272 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7272 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7272 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840HS — a 45.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8840HS (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The EPYC 7272 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7272 scores 25,161 against the Ryzen 7 8840HS's 25,156 — a 0% lead for the EPYC 7272. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7272 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8840HS.

Feature	EPYC 7272	Ryzen 7 8840HS
Cores / Threads	12 / 24+50%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	5.1 GHz+59%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.3 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+100%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
PassMark	25,161	25,156

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7272 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.