EPYC 7272 vs Ryzen 5 7400F

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7272 vs Ryzen 5 7400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7272 vs Ryzen 5 7400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7272

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,161 vs 25,529).
❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7400F moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Ryzen 5 7400F

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7272, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while EPYC 7272 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 7400F better than EPYC 7272?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7272 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 7400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 18.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 7400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 7400F is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 7400F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (170.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 7400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 12/24. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7272 vs Ryzen 5 7400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7272

The EPYC 7272 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,161 points. Launch price was $625.

Ryzen 5 7400F

The Ryzen 5 7400F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,529 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7272 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 7272 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7272 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7400F — a 38% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 7272 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7400F uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7272 scores 25,161 against the Ryzen 5 7400F's 25,529 — a 1.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 7400F. Both processors carry 32 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 7272	Ryzen 5 7400F
Cores / Threads	12 / 24+100%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	4.7 GHz+47%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.7 GHz+28%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark	25,161	25,529+1%