EPYC 7272 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7272 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7272 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7272

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (25,148 vs 25,161).
❌Launch MSRP is still $649 MSRP, while EPYC 7272 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7272 better than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is ahead with a 29.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7272 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7272 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7272 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 7272 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $649 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 29.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (38.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7272 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7272 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7272

The EPYC 7272 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,161 points. Launch price was $625.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,148 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7272 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7272 versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X — a 29.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 7272 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses ZEN+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7272 scores 25,161 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X's 25,148 — a 0.1% lead for the EPYC 7272. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7272 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.

Feature	EPYC 7272	Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	12 / 24
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	4.3 GHz+34%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.5 GHz+21%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	32 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-42%	12 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	ZEN+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	25,161	25,148

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7272 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.