EPYC 7501 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7501 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7501 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7501

2017

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Draws 155W instead of 180W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (24,925 vs 25,148).

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $649 MSRP, while EPYC 7501 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌16.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 2920X better than EPYC 7501?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper 2920X comes in at an unclear MSRP at $649 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (38.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 32/64. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7501 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7501

The EPYC 7501 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 24,925 points. Launch price was $3,400.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,148 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7501 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7501 has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7501 versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X — a 35.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 7501 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses ZEN+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7501 scores 24,925 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X's 25,148 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7501 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.

Feature	EPYC 7501	Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+167%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.3 GHz+43%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.5 GHz+75%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+100%	32 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	14 nm	12 nm-14%
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	ZEN+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	24,925	25,148

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7501 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.