EPYC 7501 vs Xeon Gold 6240

EPYC 7501 vs Xeon Gold 6240 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7501

32 / 64

24,925

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Gold 6240

18 / 36

24,918

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7501 vs Xeon Gold 6240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7501 vs Xeon Gold 6240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7501

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+158.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon Gold 6240

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 150W instead of 155W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7501 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (24,918 vs 24,925).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 64 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7501 better than Xeon Gold 6240?

Yes. EPYC 7501 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7501 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7501 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 158.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7501 still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 7501 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6240 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7501 vs Xeon Gold 6240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7501

The EPYC 7501 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 24,925 points. Launch price was $3,400.

Xeon Gold 6240

The Xeon Gold 6240 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 18 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 24,918 points. Launch price was $2,445.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7501 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6240 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the EPYC 7501 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7501 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6240 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 7501 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6240 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7501 scores 24,925 against the Xeon Gold 6240's 24,918 — a 0% lead for the EPYC 7501. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7501 vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6240.

Feature	EPYC 7501	Xeon Gold 6240
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+78%	18 / 36
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.9 GHz+30%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.6 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+159%	24.75 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+2744%	18 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	24,925	24,918

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7501 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6240 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.