EPYC 7501
VS
Ryzen 7 8840HS

EPYC 7501 vs Ryzen 7 8840HS

AMD

EPYC 7501

32 Cores64 Thrd155 WWMax: 3 GHz2017
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 8840HS

8 Cores16 Thrd28 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7501

#143
Xeon W-1350P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $250
101%
#145
Xeon 6511P
MSRP: $815|Avg: $815
101%
#148
EPYC 7501
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#153
EPYC 7303P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $594
99%
#155
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $999
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 8840HS

#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
106%
#83
Core i7-13700HX
MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A
105%
#86
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
104%
#91
Ryzen 7 8840HS
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#96
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#97
Core Ultra 5 226V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#101
Core i5-1350P
MSRP: $320|Avg: $250
93%
#102
Core i3-1220P
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 7 8840HS (2023) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightEPYC 7501Ryzen 7 8840HS
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The EPYC 7501 (2017) relies on 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Eight-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightEPYC 7501Ryzen 7 8840HS
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7501 and Ryzen 7 8840HS

AMD

EPYC 7501

The EPYC 7501 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 24,925 points. Launch price was $3,400.

AMD

Ryzen 7 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,156 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7501 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7501 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7501 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840HS — a 51.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8840HS (base: 2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The EPYC 7501 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7501 scores 24,925 against the Ryzen 7 8840HS's 25,156 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 8840HS. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7501 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8840HS.

FeatureEPYC 7501Ryzen 7 8840HS
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+300%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3 GHz
5.1 GHz+70%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.3 GHz+65%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+300%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
4 nm-71%
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
PassMark
24,925
25,156
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7501 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 7501Ryzen 7 8840HS
Socket
TR4
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0