EPYC 7501 vs Ryzen 7 8840HS

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7501 vs Ryzen 7 8840HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7501 vs Ryzen 7 8840HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7501

2017

Why buy it

✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (24,925 vs 25,156).
❌453.6% higher power demand at 155W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen 7 8840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 155W, a 127W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7501, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 8840HS better than EPYC 7501?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7501 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 8840HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 8840HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 8840HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 8840HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 7 8840HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 8840HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 32/64. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7501 vs Ryzen 7 8840HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7501

The EPYC 7501 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 24,925 points. Launch price was $3,400.

Ryzen 7 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,156 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7501 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7501 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7501 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840HS — a 51.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8840HS (base: 2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The EPYC 7501 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7501 scores 24,925 against the Ryzen 7 8840HS's 25,156 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 8840HS. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7501 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8840HS.

Feature	EPYC 7501	Ryzen 7 8840HS
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+300%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3 GHz	5.1 GHz+70%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.3 GHz+65%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+300%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
PassMark	24,925	25,156

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7501 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.