Ryzen AI 7 350 vs EPYC 7501

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7501

#143

Xeon W-1350P

MSRP: $311|Avg: $250

101%

#145

Xeon 6511P

MSRP: $815|Avg: $815

101%

#148

EPYC 7501

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#153

EPYC 7303P

MSRP: $594|Avg: $594

99%

#155

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

MSRP: $799|Avg: $999

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen AI 7 350 (2025) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Ryzen AI 7 350	EPYC 7501
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	✨ Modern (Krackan Point (2025) / 4 nm)	✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The EPYC 7501 (2017) relies on 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Eight-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Ryzen AI 7 350	EPYC 7501
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen AI 7 350 Benchmark Check

EPYC 7501 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI 7 350 and EPYC 7501

Ryzen AI 7 350

The Ryzen AI 7 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,897 points. Launch price was $299.

EPYC 7501

The EPYC 7501 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 24,925 points. Launch price was $3,400.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI 7 350 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 7501 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7501 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 350 versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 7501 — a 50% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 7 350 (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen AI 7 350 uses the Krackan Point (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 7501 uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 24,897 against the EPYC 7501's 24,925 — a 0.1% lead for the EPYC 7501. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 350 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7501.

Feature	Ryzen AI 7 350	EPYC 7501
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	32 / 64+300%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+67%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB	64 MB (total)+700%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Krackan Point (2025)	Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark	24,897	24,925

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI 7 350 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7501 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.