Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs M3 Pro 12-Core

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar M3 Pro 12-Core

#206

M3 Pro 12-Core

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 leads in gaming performance. However, the M3 Pro 12-Core is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.

Insight	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350	M3 Pro 12-Core
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	✨ Modern (Krackan Point (2025) / 4 nm)	✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350	M3 Pro 12-Core
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 Benchmark Check

M3 Pro 12-Core Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 and M3 Pro 12-Core

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,044 points. Launch price was $299.

M3 Pro 12-Core

The M3 Pro 12-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,170 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the M3 Pro 12-Core offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the M3 Pro 12-Core has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 versus 4.06 GHz on the M3 Pro 12-Core — a 20.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.748 GHz). The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is built on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 scores 24,044 against the M3 Pro 12-Core's 24,170 — a 0.5% lead for the M3 Pro 12-Core.

Feature	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350	M3 Pro 12-Core
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+23%	4.06 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.748 GHz+37%
L3 Cache	8 MB	—
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	4 nm	3 nm-25%
Architecture	Krackan Point (2025)	—
PassMark	24,044	24,170

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the M3 Pro 12-Core uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.