
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

Xeon E5-2679 v4
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs Xeon E5-2679 v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs Xeon E5-2679 v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs Xeon E5-2679 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
2025Why buy it
- β Draws 28W instead of 200W, a 172W reduction.
- β Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011-3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (24,044 vs 24,131).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 50 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2679 v4, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2679 v4
2016Why buy it
- β +0.4% higher PassMark.
- β +525% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 8 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $2,702 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β614.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 28W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 better than Xeon E5-2679 v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs Xeon E5-2679 v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,044 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2679 v4
The Xeon E5-2679 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015β2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,131 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 offers 20 cores / 40 threads β the Xeon E5-2679 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2679 v4 β a 41% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the Krackan Point (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses Broadwell (2015β2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 scores 24,044 against the Xeon E5-2679 v4's 24,131 β a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2679 v4. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2679 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 | Xeon E5-2679 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 20 / 40+150% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+52% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.5 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 50 MB+525% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 5 MB+400% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Krackan Point (2025) | Broadwell (2015β2019) |
| PassMark | 24,044 | 24,131 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 12,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 | Xeon E5-2679 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA2011-3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 1536 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 4 |
| ECC Support | β | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350) / Yes (Xeon E5-2679 v4).
| Feature | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 | Xeon E5-2679 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | Yes |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 was priced at $0, while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 came in at $2702. On launch pricing ($0 vs $2702), Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 was $2702 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 | Xeon E5-2679 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2702 |
| Performance per Dollar | β | 8.9 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













