M3 Pro 12-Core vs Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

M3 Pro 12-Core vs Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

M3 Pro 12-Core vs Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

M3 Pro 12-Core

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

2025

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,044 vs 24,170).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 better than M3 Pro 12-Core?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, M3 Pro 12-Core pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, M3 Pro 12-Core is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

M3 Pro 12-Core vs Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

M3 Pro 12-Core

The M3 Pro 12-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,170 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,044 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The M3 Pro 12-Core packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the M3 Pro 12-Core has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.06 GHz on the M3 Pro 12-Core versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 — a 20.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (base: 2.748 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is built on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. In PassMark, the M3 Pro 12-Core scores 24,170 against the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350's 24,044 — a 0.5% lead for the M3 Pro 12-Core.

Feature	M3 Pro 12-Core	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
Cores / Threads	12 / 12+50%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.06 GHz	5 GHz+23%
Base Clock	2.748 GHz+37%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	8 MB
L2 Cache	—	1 MB (per core)
Process	3 nm-25%	4 nm
Architecture	—	Krackan Point (2025)
PassMark	24,170	24,044

🧠

Memory & Platform

The M3 Pro 12-Core uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.