Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Atom x7835RE

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

4 / 8

6,724

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Atom x7835RE

8 / 8

6,795

+1.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Embedded V1605B

#341

Ryzen Embedded V2748

MSRP: $309|Avg: $359

115%

#342

Core i3-9350K

MSRP: $184|Avg: $150

113%

#343

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

111%

#344

Core i9-9900

MSRP: $423|Avg: $330

110%

#345

Core i9-9980XE

MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593

110%

#346

Core i7-10700K

MSRP: $387|Avg: $380

109%

#347

Celeron G5905T

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

105%

#348

Athlon PRO 200GE

MSRP: $55|Avg: $81

105%

#349

Core i5-9600

MSRP: $224|Avg: $219

105%

#350

Core i3-8300

MSRP: $138|Avg: $136

104%

#351

Core i5-8500B

MSRP: $192|Avg: $192

103%

#352

Core i7-13700TE

MSRP: $390|Avg: $476

103%

#353

Core i9-11900T

MSRP: $439|Avg: $413

101%

#354

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

101%

#355

Core i9-10900

MSRP: $483|Avg: $426

100%

#356

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

100%

#357

Core i9-10900K

MSRP: $499|Avg: $500

100%

#358

Celeron G4930

MSRP: $42|Avg: $57

100%

#359

Ryzen 7 2700E

MSRP: $329|Avg: $329

99%

#360

Ryzen Embedded V2516

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

99%

#361

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442

99%

#362

Core i9-14901E

MSRP: $557|Avg: $689

98%

#363

Celeron G5900T

MSRP: $42|Avg: $50

98%

#364

Celeron G6900TE

MSRP: $53|Avg: $64

97%

#365

Core i5-8600T

MSRP: $213|Avg: $213

96%

#366

Celeron G4950

MSRP: $52|Avg: $63

96%

#367

Core i9-10900E

MSRP: $488|Avg: $450

96%

#368

Core i7-9700KF

MSRP: $374|Avg: $333

95%

#369

Core i5-8400T

MSRP: $182|Avg: $179

93%

#370

Athlon 240GE

MSRP: $75|Avg: $110

92%

#371

Core 5 120UL

MSRP: $277|Avg: $270

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x7835RE

#20

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

173%

#21

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

170%

#22

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

156%

#23

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

156%

#24

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

154%

#26

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

149%

#27

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

143%

#28

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

142%

#29

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

139%

#32

Atom x7835RE

MSRP: $127|Avg: N/A

100%

#33

Core 2 Duo P8400

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

98%

#38

Core 2 Duo T8100

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

91%

#39

Atom 330

MSRP: $43|Avg: $30

90%

#43

Core 2 Duo SU7300

MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom x7835RE (2024) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Ryzen Embedded V1605B	Atom x7835RE
Gaming	Balanced gaming performance	Balanced gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($150)	✅ More affordable ($127)
Longevity	✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)	✨ Modern (Amston Lake (2024−2025) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen Embedded V1605B (2018) relies on 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Ryzen Embedded V1605B	Atom x7835RE
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+19%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($150)	✅ More affordable ($127)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B Benchmark Check

Atom x7835RE Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Atom x7835RE

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,724 points. Launch price was $149.

Atom x7835RE

The Atom x7835RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 6,795 points. Launch price was $127.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Embedded V1605B packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Atom x7835RE offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Atom x7835RE has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B versus 3.6 GHz on the Atom x7835RE — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Atom x7835RE uses Amston Lake (2024−2025) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V1605B scores 6,724 against the Atom x7835RE's 6,795 — a 1.1% lead for the Atom x7835RE. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7835RE.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V1605B	Atom x7835RE
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz+54%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	6 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2 MB (per module)+300%
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Amston Lake (2024−2025)
PassMark	6,724	6,795+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom x7835RE uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.