Ryzen Embedded V1605B
VS
Core i7-4940MX

Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Core i7-4940MX

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Core i7-4940MX

4 Cores8 Thrd57 WWMax: 4 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Embedded V1605B

#341
Ryzen Embedded V2748
MSRP: $309|Avg: $359
115%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
113%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
111%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
110%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
110%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
109%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
105%
#348
Athlon PRO 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $81
105%
#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
105%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
104%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
103%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
103%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
101%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
101%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
100%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
100%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
100%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
99%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
99%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
98%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
98%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
97%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
96%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
96%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
96%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
95%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
93%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
92%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4940MX

#1172
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4740%
#1173
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4670%
#1174
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4288%
#1175
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4268%
#1176
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4229%
#1178
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4084%
#1179
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3916%
#1180
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3910%
#1181
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3805%
#1184
Core i7-4940MX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1185
Athlon Neo X2 L325
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
99%
#1186
Core i3-2370M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1187
Core i3-3217UE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
98%
#1188
Celeron T3000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $54
97%
#1189
Core m7-6Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $393
97%
#1190
Core M-5Y10
MSRP: $281|Avg: $20
95%
#1193
Celeron 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
91%
#1194
Pentium T3400
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
91%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
90%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
88%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen Embedded V1605B (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen Embedded V1605BCore i7-4940MX
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-4940MX (2014) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen Embedded V1605BCore i7-4940MX
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Core i7-4940MX

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,724 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i7-4940MX

The Core i7-4940MX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 57 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,783 points. Launch price was $1,096.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Core i7-4940MX share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B versus 4 GHz on the Core i7-4940MX — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-4940MX (base: 2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4940MX uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V1605B scores 6,724 against the Core i7-4940MX's 6,783 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-4940MX. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4940MX.

FeatureRyzen Embedded V1605BCore i7-4940MX
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
4 GHz+11%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.1 GHz+55%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+300%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Zen (2017−2020)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
6,724
6,783
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4940MX uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen Embedded V1605BCore i7-4940MX
Socket
FP5
PGA946
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0