Ryzen Embedded V2516 vs Xeon E5-2650 v4
Ryzen Embedded V2516
Xeon E5-2650 v4
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Embedded V2516
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2650 v4
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Embedded V2516 | Xeon E5-2650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($300) | ✅ More affordable ($45) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Renoir (2020−2023) / 7 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-EP (2016) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Embedded V2516 | Xeon E5-2650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+565%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($300) | ✅ More affordable ($45) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Xeon E5-2650 v4
Ryzen Embedded V2516
The Ryzen Embedded V2516 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.95 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 13,329 points. Launch price was $149.
Xeon E5-2650 v4
The Xeon E5-2650 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,290 points. Launch price was $1,166.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Embedded V2516 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2650 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.95 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2516 versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650 v4 — a 30.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V2516 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V2516 uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V2516 scores 13,329 against the Xeon E5-2650 v4's 13,290 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V2516. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2516 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V2516 | Xeon E5-2650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.95 GHz+36% | 2.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.2 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+275% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir (2020−2023) | Broadwell-EP (2016) |
| PassMark | 13,329 | 13,290 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Embedded V2516 uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V2516 | Xeon E5-2650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1536 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Embedded V2516) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2650 v4). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2650 v4 targets Server.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V2516 | Xeon E5-2650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Embedded V2516 launched at $300 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 debuted at $1166. At current prices ($300 vs $45), the Xeon E5-2650 v4 is $255 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Embedded V2516 delivers 44.4 pts/$ vs 295.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2650 v4 — making the Xeon E5-2650 v4 the 147.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V2516 | Xeon E5-2650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-74% | $1166 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $45-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4 | 295.3+565% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Xeon E5-2650 v4
