Ryzen Embedded V3C18I vs Xeon E5-1680 v4

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I vs Xeon E5-1680 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I

8 / 16

13,856

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-1680 v4

8 / 16

13,945

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I vs Xeon E5-1680 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I vs Xeon E5-1680 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 140W, a 125W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1680 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,856 vs 13,945).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $500 MSRP, while Xeon E5-1680 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-1680 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

❌833.3% higher power demand at 140W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen Embedded V3C18I moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-1680 v4 better than Ryzen Embedded V3C18I?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1680 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen Embedded V3C18I is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-1680 v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 16.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1680 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-1680 v4 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon E5-1680 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Embedded V3C18I only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 16.7% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I vs Xeon E5-1680 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I

The Ryzen Embedded V3C18I is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,856 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-1680 v4

The Xeon E5-1680 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,945 points. Launch price was $1,723.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I and Xeon E5-1680 v4 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-1680 v4 — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1680 v4 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V3C18I uses the Rembrandt (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-1680 v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I scores 13,856 against the Xeon E5-1680 v4's 13,945 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-1680 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1680 v4.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V3C18I	Xeon E5-1680 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	4 GHz+5%
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	3.4 GHz+79%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	6 nm-57%	14 nm
Architecture	Rembrandt (2022)	Broadwell-EP (2016)
PassMark	13,856	13,945

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded V3C18I uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-1680 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.