Ryzen Embedded V3C18I vs Xeon E5-2667 v4

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I vs Xeon E5-2667 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I

8 / 16

13,856

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2667 v4

8 / 16

13,776

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I vs Xeon E5-2667 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I vs Xeon E5-2667 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 135W, a 120W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2667 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $500 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2667 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2667 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (13,776 vs 13,856).
❌800% higher power demand at 135W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen Embedded V3C18I moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded V3C18I better than Xeon E5-2667 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2667 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen Embedded V3C18I is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded V3C18I is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I is the better buy right now. Ryzen Embedded V3C18I comes in at an unclear MSRP at $500 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2667 v4 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 10.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I vs Xeon E5-2667 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I

The Ryzen Embedded V3C18I is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,856 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2667 v4

The Xeon E5-2667 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,776 points. Launch price was $2,057.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I and Xeon E5-2667 v4 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 v4 — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I (base: 1.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V3C18I uses the Rembrandt (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-2667 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I scores 13,856 against the Xeon E5-2667 v4's 13,776 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2667 v4.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V3C18I	Xeon E5-2667 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+6%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	3.2 GHz+68%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	25 MB+56%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB+300%
Process	6 nm-57%	14 nm
Architecture	Rembrandt (2022)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	13,856	13,776

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded V3C18I uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2667 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.