
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 vs Core i7-9700K

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Core i7-9700K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-9700K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($300) | ✅ More affordable ($200) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($300) | ✅ More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Core i7-9700K

Ryzen Threadripper 1950
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,077 points. Launch price was $299.

Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Core i7-9700K offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K — a 42% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 1950 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-9700K uses Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 scores 22,077 against the Core i7-9700K's 14,397 — a 42.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+100% | 8 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.9 GHz+53% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+167% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 22,077+53% | 14,397 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,780 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,961 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,100 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950 uses the SP3r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-9700K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950) vs 2 (Core i7-9700K). PCIe lanes: 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950) vs 16 (Core i7-9700K) — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950) and Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3r2 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64+300% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 1950) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 1950 targets Workstation, Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 1950 rivals Core i9-7960X.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Workstation | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950 launched at $999 MSRP, while the Core i7-9700K debuted at $385. At current prices ($300 vs $200), the Core i7-9700K is $100 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 delivers 73.6 pts/$ vs 72.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-9700K — making the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 the 2.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $385-61% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $200-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.6+2% | 72.0 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















