Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
VS
Core Ultra 5 235H

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X vs Core Ultra 5 235H

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

16 Cores32 Thrd180 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 235H

14 Cores14 Thrd20 WWMax: 5 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

#316
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1400
109%
#317
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
109%
#318
Core i3-10305T
MSRP: $143|Avg: $143
109%
#319
Ryzen Embedded V1202B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
107%
#320
Core i3-10100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $146
107%
#321
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
107%
#322
Celeron G6900
MSRP: $52|Avg: $77
106%
#323
Core i9-11900K
MSRP: $539|Avg: $435
105%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
103%
#325
Core i9-12900E
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
103%
#326
Celeron G4900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $40
103%
#327
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $452
102%
#328
Core i9-9900KS
MSRP: $513|Avg: $350
102%
#329
Core i5-11600T
MSRP: $262|Avg: $262
101%
#330
Core i9-9900K
MSRP: $488|Avg: $331
100%
#331
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
MSRP: $899|Avg: $540
100%
#332
Celeron G4930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
100%
#333
Core i9-9920X
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $464
99%
#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
97%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
96%
#336
Core i7-8700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $196
96%
#337
Ryzen 5 3600XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $357
95%
#338
Core i9-10980XE
MSRP: $979|Avg: $620
95%
#339
Core i5-8500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $149
95%
#340
Core i9-9900KF
MSRP: $488|Avg: $350
94%
#341
Ryzen Embedded V2748
MSRP: $309|Avg: $359
94%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
93%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
91%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
90%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
90%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 235H

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
128%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
120%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
118%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
113%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
108%
#25
Core Ultra 5 235H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
98%
#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
91%
#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core Ultra 5 235H (2025) utilizes 5 nm technology and DDR5-6400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen Threadripper 2950XCore Ultra 5 235H
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($540)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (ZEN+ (2018−2019) / 12 nm)
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 5 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (2018) relies on 12 nm technology and **DDR4 Quad-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen Threadripper 2950XCore Ultra 5 235H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($540)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and Core Ultra 5 235H

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 29,462 points. Launch price was $899.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 235H

The Core Ultra 5 235H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 29,820 points. Launch price was $354.

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 235H offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235H — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H (base: 3.5 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 235H uses Arrow Lake-H (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X scores 29,462 against the Core Ultra 5 235H's 29,820 — a 1.2% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,444 vs 17,607 (19.7% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,255 vs 2,693, a 72.8% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,814 vs 14,040 (45.7% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H). L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X vs 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 235H.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 2950XCore Ultra 5 235H
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+14%
14 / 14
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
5 GHz+14%
Base Clock
3.5 GHz
4.4 GHz+26%
L3 Cache
32 MB+78%
18 MB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
Process
12 nm
5 nm-58%
Architecture
ZEN+ (2018−2019)
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
PassMark
29,462
29,820+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
21,444+22%
17,607
Geekbench 6 Single
1,255
2,693+115%
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,814
14,040+59%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 5 235H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 235H — the Core Ultra 5 235H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X) vs 2 (Core Ultra 5 235H). PCIe lanes: 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X) vs 28 (Core Ultra 5 235H) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Socket TR4 / X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X) and WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 235H).

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 2950XCore Ultra 5 235H
Socket
TR4
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
DDR5-6400+25%
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+33%
192 GB
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
64+129%
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 5 235H). The Core Ultra 5 235H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 140T Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 235H targets Thin-and-light Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 235H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 2950XCore Ultra 5 235H
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc 140T Graphics
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Thin-and-light Performance Laptop