
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Xeon Gold 6148
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X vs Xeon Gold 6148 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X vs Xeon Gold 6148 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X vs Xeon Gold 6148: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,173 less on MSRP ($899 MSRP vs $3,072 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 246.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.8 vs 9.4 PassMark/$ ($899 MSRP vs $3,072 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6148
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,500 vs 21,444).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.4 vs 32.8 PassMark/$ ($3,072 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 2950X better than Xeon Gold 6148?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X vs Xeon Gold 6148 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 29,462 points. Launch price was $899.

Xeon Gold 6148
The Xeon Gold 6148 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 29,021 points. Launch price was $3,072.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6148 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6148 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6148 — a 17.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6148 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X scores 29,462 against the Xeon Gold 6148's 29,021 — a 1.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,444 vs 18,500 (14.7% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,255 vs 1,254, a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,814 vs 9,445 (6.9% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6148). L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6148.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | Xeon Gold 6148 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 20 / 40+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+19% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+46% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+16% | 27.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+2460% | 20 MB |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | ZEN+ (2018−2019) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 29,462+2% | 29,021 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,444+16% | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,255 | 1,254 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,814 | 9,445+7% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6148 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon Gold 6148 — the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6148 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6148). PCIe lanes: 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6148) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Socket TR4 / X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X) and C620 (Xeon Gold 6148).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | Xeon Gold 6148 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933+10% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 768 GB+200% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 6+50% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 64+33% | 48 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6148 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6148). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6148 targets Legacy Enterprise Workloads. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6148 rivals EPYC 7401.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | Xeon Gold 6148 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Enterprise Workloads |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X was priced at $899, while the Xeon Gold 6148 came in at $3072. On launch pricing ($899 vs $3072), Ryzen Threadripper 2950X was $2173 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X delivers 32.8 pts/$ vs 9.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6148 — making the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X the 110.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | Xeon Gold 6148 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899-71% | $3072 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.8+249% | 9.4 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













