Ryzen Threadripper 7980X vs EPYC 9475F
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
EPYC 9475F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9475F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($5,200) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($7,592) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Storm Peak (2023) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+62%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($5,200) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($7,592) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 7980X and EPYC 9475F
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
The Ryzen Threadripper 7980X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,949 points. Launch price was $4,999.
EPYC 9475F
The EPYC 9475F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,476 points. Launch price was $7,592.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 7980X packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9475F offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X versus 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9475F — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.65 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 7980X uses the Storm Peak (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 9475F uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X scores 135,949 against the EPYC 9475F's 122,476 — a 10.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,050 vs 1,960, a 43.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,000 vs 45,000 (53.5% advantage for the EPYC 9475F). Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+33% | 48 / 96 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+6% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.65 GHz+14% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Storm Peak (2023) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 135,949+11% | 122,476 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 98,427 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,050+56% | 1,960 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 26,000 | 45,000+73% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 7980X uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9475F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The EPYC 9475F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 7980X) vs 12 (EPYC 9475F). PCIe lanes: 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 7980X) vs 128 (EPYC 9475F) — the EPYC 9475F offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 7980X) and SP5 (EPYC 9475F).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-6000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB | 6144 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 12+200% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 88 | 128+45% |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper 7980X) vs AMD-V (EPYC 9475F). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 7980X targets High-end Desktop / Content Creation, EPYC 9475F targets Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 7980X rivals Xeon w7-3465X; EPYC 9475F rivals Xeon 6952P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-end Desktop / Content Creation | Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 7980X launched at $4999 MSRP, while the EPYC 9475F debuted at $7592. At current prices ($5200 vs $7592), the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X is $2392 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X delivers 26.1 pts/$ vs 16.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 9475F — making the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X the 47.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4999-34% | $7592 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5200-32% | $7592 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.1+62% | 16.1 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper 7980X and EPYC 9475F
