Core i5-13600K vs EPYC 9475F
Core i5-13600K
EPYC 9475F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13600K
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9475F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-13600K | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($319) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($7,592) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-13600K | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+632%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($319) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($7,592) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and EPYC 9475F
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.
EPYC 9475F
The EPYC 9475F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,476 points. Launch price was $7,592.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 9475F offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 9475F has 34 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9475F — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.65 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9475F uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the EPYC 9475F's 122,476 — a 105.9% lead for the EPYC 9475F. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9475F.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 48 / 96+243% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+6% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.65 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 256 MB (total)+967% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 37,655 | 122,476+225% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,960 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 45,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9475F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The EPYC 9475F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13600K) vs 12 (EPYC 9475F). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 128 (EPYC 9475F) — the EPYC 9475F offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and SP5 (EPYC 9475F).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-6000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 6144 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 12+500% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9475F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs AMD-V (EPYC 9475F). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 9475F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, EPYC 9475F targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9475F rivals Xeon 6952P.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Server |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the EPYC 9475F debuted at $7592. At current prices ($319 vs $7592), the Core i5-13600K is $7273 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 118.0 pts/$ vs 16.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 9475F — making the Core i5-13600K the 151.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-96% | $7592 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $319-96% | $7592 |
| Performance per Dollar | 118.0+633% | 16.1 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-13600K and EPYC 9475F
