Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Xeon w9-3595X
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X vs Xeon w9-3595X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X vs Xeon w9-3595X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X vs Xeon w9-3595X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,390 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 273.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.9 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 385W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (41,000 vs 130,000).
Xeon w9-3595X
2024Why buy it
- ✅+217.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅27.3% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 9960X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 61.9 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 9960X better than Xeon w9-3595X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X vs Xeon w9-3595X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 92,808 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Xeon w9-3595X
The Xeon w9-3595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 60 cores and 120 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 385 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 97,534 points. Launch price was $5,889.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w9-3595X offers 60 cores / 120 threads — the Xeon w9-3595X has 36 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3595X — a 9.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X uses the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X scores 92,808 against the Xeon w9-3595X's 97,534 — a 5% lead for the Xeon w9-3595X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 41,000 vs 130,000 (104.1% advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,200 vs 2,300, a 32.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,000 vs 17,118 (41.2% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3595X.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 60 / 120+150% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+10% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+110% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+14% | 112.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Shimada Peak (2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 92,808 | 97,534+5% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 41,000 | 130,000+217% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,200+39% | 2,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 26,000+52% | 17,118 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3595X — the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w9-3595X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3595X). PCIe lanes: 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3595X) — the Xeon w9-3595X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) and W790 (Xeon w9-3595X).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+33% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB | 4096 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 88 | 112+27% |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support true virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 9960X targets Content Creation / Rendering, Xeon w9-3595X targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 9960X rivals Xeon w7-3555; Xeon w9-3595X rivals Threadripper PRO 7985WX.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | true |
| Target Use | Content Creation / Rendering | High-end Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X was priced at $1499, while the Xeon w9-3595X came in at $5889. On launch pricing ($1499 vs $5889), Ryzen Threadripper 9960X was $4390 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X delivers 61.9 pts/$ vs 16.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3595X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X the 115.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499-75% | $5889 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.9+273% | 16.6 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper 9960X and Xeon w9-3595X
