Ryzen Threadripper 9960X vs Xeon w9-3595X
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Xeon w9-3595X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w9-3595X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($1,419) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($6,000) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Shimada Peak (2025) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+302%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($1,419) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($6,000) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 9960X and Xeon w9-3595X
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 92,808 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Xeon w9-3595X
The Xeon w9-3595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 60 cores and 120 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 385 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 97,534 points. Launch price was $5,889.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w9-3595X offers 60 cores / 120 threads — the Xeon w9-3595X has 36 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3595X — a 9.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X uses the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X scores 92,808 against the Xeon w9-3595X's 97,534 — a 5% lead for the Xeon w9-3595X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 41,000 vs 130,000 (104.1% advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,200 vs 2,300, a 32.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,000 vs 17,118 (41.2% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3595X.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 60 / 120+150% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+10% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+110% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+14% | 112.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Shimada Peak (2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 92,808 | 97,534+5% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 41,000 | 130,000+217% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,200+39% | 2,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 26,000+52% | 17,118 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Xeon w9-3595X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3595X). PCIe lanes: 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3595X) — the Xeon w9-3595X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) and W790 (Xeon w9-3595X).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB | 4096 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 88 | 112+27% |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support true virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 9960X targets Content Creation / Rendering, Xeon w9-3595X targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 9960X rivals Xeon w7-3555; Xeon w9-3595X rivals Threadripper PRO 7985WX.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | true |
| Target Use | Content Creation / Rendering | High-end Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X launched at $1499 MSRP, while the Xeon w9-3595X debuted at $5889. At current prices ($1419 vs $6000), the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is $4581 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X delivers 65.4 pts/$ vs 16.3 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3595X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X the 120.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499-75% | $5889 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1419-76% | $6000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+301% | 16.3 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper 9960X and Xeon w9-3595X
