Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
Xeon 6737P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX vs Xeon 6737P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX vs Xeon 6737P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX vs Xeon 6737P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,346 less on MSRP ($2,649 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 94.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.1 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($2,649 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (23,294 vs 45,000).
- ❌29.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 270W.
Xeon 6737P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+93.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Draws 270W instead of 350W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 31.1 PassMark/$ ($4,995 MSRP vs $2,649 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6737P better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX vs Xeon 6737P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 82,268 points. Launch price was $2,649.
Xeon 6737P
The Xeon 6737P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 79,634 points. Launch price was $4,995.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon 6737P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon 6737P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon 6737P — a 28% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX uses the Storm Peak (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon 6737P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX scores 82,268 against the Xeon 6737P's 79,634 — a 3.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,686 vs 2,000, a 29.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 23,294 vs 45,000 (63.6% advantage for the Xeon 6737P). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6737P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+32% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+45% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 144 MB (total)+13% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm | Intel 3 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Storm Peak (2023) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 82,268+3% | 79,634 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 38,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,686+34% | 2,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 23,294 | 45,000+93% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6737P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6737P — the Xeon 6737P supports 23.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6737P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX) vs 88 (Xeon 6737P) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX) and C741 (Xeon 6737P).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-6400+23% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4096 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6737P). Primary use case: Xeon 6737P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6737P rivals EPYC 9005.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | High Performance Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX was priced at $2649, while the Xeon 6737P came in at $4995. On launch pricing ($2649 vs $4995), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX was $2346 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX delivers 31.1 pts/$ vs 15.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6737P — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX the 64.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2649-47% | $4995 |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.1+96% | 15.9 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and Xeon 6737P
