
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon Max 9480
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX vs Xeon Max 9480 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX vs Xeon Max 9480 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX vs Xeon Max 9480: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $10,331 less on MSRP ($2,649 MSRP vs $12,980 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 386.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.1 vs 6.4 PassMark/$ ($2,649 MSRP vs $12,980 MSRP).
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (23,294 vs 55,000).
Xeon Max 9480
2023Why buy it
- ✅+136.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 31.1 PassMark/$ ($12,980 MSRP vs $2,649 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Max 9480 better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX vs Xeon Max 9480 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 82,268 points. Launch price was $2,649.

Xeon Max 9480
The Xeon Max 9480 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,913 points. Launch price was $12,980.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Max 9480 offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Xeon Max 9480 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Max 9480 — a 40.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX uses the Storm Peak (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Max 9480 uses Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX scores 82,268 against the Xeon Max 9480's 82,913 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon Max 9480. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,686 vs 1,900, a 34.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 23,294 vs 55,000 (81% advantage for the Xeon Max 9480). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon Max 9480.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 56 / 112+133% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+51% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+121% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+14% | 112.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm-50% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Storm Peak (2023) | Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) |
| PassMark | 82,268 | 82,913 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 38,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,686+41% | 1,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 23,294 | 55,000+136% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Max 9480 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Max 9480 — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Max 9480 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX) vs 80 (Xeon Max 9480) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX) and C741 (Xeon Max 9480).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+8% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4096 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Max 9480). Primary use case: Xeon Max 9480 targets HPC Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Max 9480 rivals EPYC 9684X.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | HPC Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX was priced at $2649, while the Xeon Max 9480 came in at $12980. On launch pricing ($2649 vs $12980), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX was $10331 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX delivers 31.1 pts/$ vs 6.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Max 9480 — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX the 131.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2649-80% | $12980 |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.1+386% | 6.4 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














