EPYC 9374F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
EPYC 9374F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9374F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9374F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9374F
2022Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 320W instead of 350W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (82,009 vs 82,268).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 31.1 PassMark/$ ($4,850 MSRP vs $2,649 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,201 less on MSRP ($2,649 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 83.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.1 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($2,649 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX better than EPYC 9374F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9374F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9374F
The EPYC 9374F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,009 points. Launch price was $4,850.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 82,268 points. Launch price was $2,649.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9374F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 9374F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9374F versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX — a 20.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX (base: 3.85 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The EPYC 9374F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9374F scores 82,009 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX's 82,268 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9374F vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9374F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+33% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 5.3 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 3.85 GHz | 4.2 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 82,009 | 82,268 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,686 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 23,294 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9374F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9374F versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9374F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9374F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9374F) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9374F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | DDR5-5200+8% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB+200% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9374F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 9374F rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+.
| Feature | EPYC 9374F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9374F was priced at $4850, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX came in at $2649. On launch pricing ($4850 vs $2649), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX was $2201 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9374F delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 31.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX the 59% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9374F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4850 | $2649-45% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.9 | 31.1+84% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9374F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
