EPYC 9374F vs Xeon Platinum 8592+

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9374F

32 Cores64 Thrd320 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8592+

64 Cores128 Thrd350 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2023

Similar parts

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9374F vs Xeon Platinum 8592+ Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9374F

32 / 64

82,009

0.0%

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Xeon Platinum 8592+

64 / 128

84,013

+2.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9374F vs Xeon Platinum 8592+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9374F vs Xeon Platinum 8592+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9374F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +36.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $6,750 less on MSRP ($4,850 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 133.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($4,850 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
✅Draws 320W instead of 350W, a 30W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (82,009 vs 84,013).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 320 MB).

Xeon Platinum 8592+

2023

Why buy it

✅+2.4% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9374F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($11,600 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9374F better than Xeon Platinum 8592+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9374F is ahead with a 36.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8592+ pulls ahead with 2.4% better PassMark. Xeon Platinum 8592+ also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8592+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.4% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9374F is the better buy right now. EPYC 9374F comes in $6,750 cheaper on MSRP at $4,850 MSRP versus $11,600 MSRP, and it still gives you a 36.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8592+ is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.4% better PassMark. It is also 133.5% better value on MSRP (16.9 vs 7.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8592+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), 25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 32/64. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9374F vs Xeon Platinum 8592+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9374F

The EPYC 9374F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,009 points. Launch price was $4,850.

Xeon Platinum 8592+

The Xeon Platinum 8592+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,013 points. Launch price was $11,600.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9374F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8592+ has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9374F versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — a 9.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 9374F (base: 3.85 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The EPYC 9374F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9374F scores 82,009 against the Xeon Platinum 8592+'s 84,013 — a 2.4% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8592+. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9374F vs 320 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8592+.

Feature	EPYC 9374F	Xeon Platinum 8592+
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	64 / 128+100%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+10%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.85 GHz+103%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	320 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	82,009	84,013+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9374F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9374F versus 5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — the Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9374F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9374F) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8592+). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9374F) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8592+) — the EPYC 9374F offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9374F) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8592+).

Feature	EPYC 9374F	Xeon Platinum 8592+
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	5600+17%
Max RAM Capacity	6144+50%	4096
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9374F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8592+). Direct competitor: EPYC 9374F rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+; Xeon Platinum 8592+ rivals EPYC 9554.

Feature	EPYC 9374F	Xeon Platinum 8592+
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9374F was priced at $4850, while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ came in at $11600. On launch pricing ($4850 vs $11600), EPYC 9374F was $6750 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9374F delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 7.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — making the EPYC 9374F the 80% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9374F	Xeon Platinum 8592+
MSRP	$4850-58%	$11600
Performance per Dollar	16.9+135%	7.2
Release Date	2022	2023

Search EPYC 9374F on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8592+ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.