
EPYC 9374F vs Xeon Max 9480

EPYC 9374F

Xeon Max 9480
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9374F
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Max 9480
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9374F | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($3,466) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($12,980) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9374F | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+270%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($3,466) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($12,980) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9374F and Xeon Max 9480

EPYC 9374F
The EPYC 9374F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,009 points. Launch price was $4,850.

Xeon Max 9480
The Xeon Max 9480 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,913 points. Launch price was $12,980.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9374F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Max 9480 offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Xeon Max 9480 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9374F versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Max 9480 — a 20.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9374F (base: 3.85 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The EPYC 9374F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon Max 9480 uses Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9374F scores 82,009 against the Xeon Max 9480's 82,913 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon Max 9480. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9374F vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon Max 9480.
| Feature | EPYC 9374F | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 56 / 112+75% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+23% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.85 GHz+103% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+128% | 112.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-50% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) |
| PassMark | 82,009 | 82,913+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 55,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9374F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Max 9480 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9374F versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Max 9480 — the EPYC 9374F supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9374F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9374F) vs 8 (Xeon Max 9480). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9374F) vs 80 (Xeon Max 9480) — the EPYC 9374F offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9374F) and C741 (Xeon Max 9480).
| Feature | EPYC 9374F | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+95900% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 4096 GB+69904967% |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9374F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Max 9480). Primary use case: Xeon Max 9480 targets HPC Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9374F rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+; Xeon Max 9480 rivals EPYC 9684X.
| Feature | EPYC 9374F | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | HPC Server |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9374F launched at $4850 MSRP, while the Xeon Max 9480 debuted at $12980. At current prices ($3466 vs $12980), the EPYC 9374F is $9514 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9374F delivers 23.7 pts/$ vs 6.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Max 9480 — making the EPYC 9374F the 115% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9374F | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4850-63% | $12980 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3466-73% | $12980 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.7+270% | 6.4 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















