EPYC 9374F vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

EPYC 9374F vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9374F

32 / 64

82,009

+2.9%

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

48 / 96

79,683

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9374F vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9374F vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9374F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +31.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,647 less on MSRP ($4,850 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Delivers 37.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($4,850 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Draws 320W instead of 350W, a 30W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

2023

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9374F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (79,683 vs 82,009).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9374F better than Xeon Platinum 8568Y+?

Yes. EPYC 9374F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 31.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9374F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 31.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9374F is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.9% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9374F is the better buy right now. EPYC 9374F comes in $1,647 cheaper on MSRP at $4,850 MSRP versus $6,497 MSRP, and it still gives you a 31.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 37.9% better value on MSRP (16.9 vs 12.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9374F vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9374F

The EPYC 9374F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,009 points. Launch price was $4,850.

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

The Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 79,683 points. Launch price was $6,497.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9374F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9374F versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — a 7.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9374F (base: 3.85 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 9374F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9374F scores 82,009 against the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+'s 79,683 — a 2.9% lead for the EPYC 9374F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9374F vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+.

Feature	EPYC 9374F	Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	48 / 96+50%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+7%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.85 GHz+67%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	300 MB (total)+17%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	82,009+3%	79,683
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	55,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9374F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9374F versus DDR5-5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9374F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9374F) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9374F) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+) — the EPYC 9374F offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9374F) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+).

Feature	EPYC 9374F	Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	DDR5-5600+17%
Max RAM Capacity	6144 GB+50%	4096 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9374F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9374F rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+; Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ rivals EPYC 9554.

Feature	EPYC 9374F	Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	High Performance Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9374F was priced at $4850, while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ came in at $6497. On launch pricing ($4850 vs $6497), EPYC 9374F was $1647 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9374F delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 12.3 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — making the EPYC 9374F the 31.8% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9374F	Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
MSRP	$4850-25%	$6497
Performance per Dollar	16.9+37%	12.3
Release Date	2022	2023

Search EPYC 9374F on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.