EPYC 9374F vs Xeon w9-3575X

EPYC 9374F vs Xeon w9-3575X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9374F

32 / 64

82,009

0.0%

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Xeon w9-3575X

44 / 88

82,507

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9374F vs Xeon w9-3575X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9374F vs Xeon w9-3575X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9374F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+162.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 98 MB).
✅Draws 320W instead of 340W, a 20W reduction.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (82,009 vs 82,507).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 21.8 PassMark/$ ($4,850 MSRP vs $3,789 MSRP).

Xeon w9-3575X

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $1,061 less on MSRP ($3,789 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
✅Delivers 28.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($3,789 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9374F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (98 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w9-3575X better than EPYC 9374F?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9374F is ahead with a 11.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3575X pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. EPYC 9374F also has the bigger cache pool with 162.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 98 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3575X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 44 cores and 88 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w9-3575X is the better buy right now. Xeon w9-3575X comes in $1,061 cheaper on MSRP at $3,789 MSRP versus $4,850 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 9374F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 11.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 28.8% better value on MSRP (21.8 vs 16.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w9-3575X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 44 cores / 88 threads instead of 32/64. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9374F vs Xeon w9-3575X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9374F

The EPYC 9374F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,009 points. Launch price was $4,850.

Xeon w9-3575X

The Xeon w9-3575X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 44 cores and 88 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 97.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 340 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,507 points. Launch price was $3,789.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9374F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon w9-3575X offers 44 cores / 88 threads — the Xeon w9-3575X has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9374F versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3575X — a 11% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3575X (base: 3.85 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 9374F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon w9-3575X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9374F scores 82,009 against the Xeon w9-3575X's 82,507 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon w9-3575X. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9374F vs 97.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3575X.

Feature	EPYC 9374F	Xeon w9-3575X
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	44 / 88+38%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock	3.85 GHz+75%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+163%	97.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	82,009	82,507
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	60,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	19,320

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9374F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w9-3575X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9374F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9374F) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3575X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9374F) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3575X) — the EPYC 9374F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9374F) and W790 (Xeon w9-3575X).

Feature	EPYC 9374F	Xeon w9-3575X
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	6144 GB+50%	4096 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w9-3575X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9374F) vs true (Xeon w9-3575X). Direct competitor: EPYC 9374F rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+; Xeon w9-3575X rivals Ryzen Threadripper 7970X.

Feature	EPYC 9374F	Xeon w9-3575X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9374F was priced at $4850, while the Xeon w9-3575X came in at $3789. On launch pricing ($4850 vs $3789), Xeon w9-3575X was $1061 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9374F delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 21.8 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3575X — making the Xeon w9-3575X the 25.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9374F	Xeon w9-3575X
MSRP	$4850	$3789-22%
Performance per Dollar	16.9	21.8+29%
Release Date	2022	2024

Search EPYC 9374F on Amazon

Search Xeon w9-3575X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.