EPYC 7763 vs EPYC 9374F

EPYC 7763 vs EPYC 9374F Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7763

64 / 128

84,440

+3.0%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

EPYC 9374F

32 / 64

82,009

0.0%

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7763 vs EPYC 9374F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7763 vs EPYC 9374F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7763

2021

Why buy it

✅+3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 280W instead of 320W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9374F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($7,890 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9374F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9374F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +36.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,040 less on MSRP ($4,850 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).
✅Delivers 58.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($4,850 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (82,009 vs 84,440).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9374F better than EPYC 7763?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9374F is ahead with a 36.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7763 pulls ahead with 3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7763 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9374F is the better buy right now. EPYC 9374F comes in $3,040 cheaper on MSRP at $4,850 MSRP versus $7,890 MSRP, and it still gives you a 36.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7763 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 3% better PassMark. It is also 58.0% better value on MSRP (16.9 vs 10.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9374F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7763 vs EPYC 9374F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7763

The EPYC 7763 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 84,440 points. Launch price was $7,890.

EPYC 9374F

The EPYC 9374F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,009 points. Launch price was $4,850.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7763 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9374F offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7763 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7763 versus 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9374F — a 20.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9374F (base: 2.45 GHz vs 3.85 GHz). The EPYC 7763 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 9374F uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7763 scores 84,440 against the EPYC 9374F's 82,009 — a 2.9% lead for the EPYC 7763. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 7763	EPYC 9374F
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+100%	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	4.3 GHz+23%
Base Clock	2.45 GHz	3.85 GHz+57%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm+	5 nm, 6 nm-29%
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	84,440+3%	82,009

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7763 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9374F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7763 versus 4800 on the EPYC 9374F — the EPYC 9374F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9374F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7763) vs 12 (EPYC 9374F). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7763) and SP5 (EPYC 9374F).

Feature	EPYC 7763	EPYC 9374F
Socket	SP3	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	6144+50%
RAM Channels	8	12+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9374F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7763) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9374F). Direct competitor: EPYC 7763 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 9374F rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+.

Feature	EPYC 7763	EPYC 9374F
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7763 was priced at $7890, while the EPYC 9374F came in at $4850. On launch pricing ($7890 vs $4850), EPYC 9374F was $3040 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7763 delivers 10.7 pts/$ vs 16.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9374F — making the EPYC 9374F the 45% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7763	EPYC 9374F
MSRP	$7890	$4850-39%
Performance per Dollar	10.7	16.9+58%
Release Date	2021	2022

Search EPYC 7763 on Amazon

Search EPYC 9374F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.