
EPYC 7763

EPYC 9454
EPYC 7763 vs EPYC 9454 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7763 vs EPYC 9454 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7763 vs EPYC 9454: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7763
2021Why buy it
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9454 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (84,440 vs 87,961).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($7,890 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
- βOlder platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9454 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
EPYC 9454
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +9.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $2,665 less on MSRP ($5,225 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).
- β Delivers 57.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.8 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($5,225 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).
- β Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βFewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9454 better than EPYC 7763?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7763 vs EPYC 9454 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7763
The EPYC 7763 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021β2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 84,440 points. Launch price was $7,890.

EPYC 9454
The EPYC 9454 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022β2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 87,961 points. Launch price was $5,225.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7763 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9454 offers 48 cores / 96 threads β the EPYC 7763 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7763 versus 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9454 β a 8.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9454 (base: 2.45 GHz vs 2.75 GHz). The EPYC 7763 uses the Milan (2021β2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 9454 uses Genoa (2022β2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7763 scores 84,440 against the EPYC 9454's 87,961 β a 4.1% lead for the EPYC 9454. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 7763 | EPYC 9454 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+33% | 48 / 96 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.45 GHz | 2.75 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021β2023) | Genoa (2022β2023) |
| PassMark | 84,440 | 87,961+4% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7763 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9454 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7763 versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9454 β the EPYC 9454 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7763 supports up to 4096 TB of RAM compared to 6 TB β 68166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7763) vs 12 (EPYC 9454). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7763) and SP5 (EPYC 9454).
| Feature | EPYC 7763 | EPYC 9454 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | DDR5-4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 TB+68167% | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7763) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9454). Primary use case: EPYC 9454 targets Data Center. Direct competitor: EPYC 7763 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 9454 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | EPYC 7763 | EPYC 9454 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | β | Data Center |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7763 was priced at $7890, while the EPYC 9454 came in at $5225. On launch pricing ($7890 vs $5225), EPYC 9454 was $2665 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7763 delivers 10.7 pts/$ vs 16.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 9454 β making the EPYC 9454 the 44.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7763 | EPYC 9454 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7890 | $5225-34% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.7 | 16.8+57% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















