EPYC 7763 vs Xeon w9-3495X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7763

64 Cores128 Thrd280 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2021

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w9-3495X

56 Cores112 Thrd350 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Similar parts

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7763 vs Xeon w9-3495X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7763

64 / 128

84,440

0.0%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Xeon w9-3495X

56 / 112

90,441

+7.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7763 vs Xeon w9-3495X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7763 vs Xeon w9-3495X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7763

2021

Why buy it

✅+143.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 105 MB).
✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3495X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (84,440 vs 90,441).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($7,890 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon w9-3495X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w9-3495X

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,001 less on MSRP ($5,889 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).
✅Delivers 43.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.4 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (105 MB vs 256 MB).
❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w9-3495X better than EPYC 7763?

Yes. Xeon w9-3495X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 21.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 7.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w9-3495X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 21.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3495X is the stronger fit. You are getting 7.1% better PassMark, backed by 56 cores and 112 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w9-3495X is the better buy right now. Xeon w9-3495X comes in $2,001 cheaper on MSRP at $5,889 MSRP versus $7,890 MSRP, and it still gives you a 21.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 43.5% better value on MSRP (15.4 vs 10.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w9-3495X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 56 cores / 112 threads instead of 64/128, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7763 vs Xeon w9-3495X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7763

The EPYC 7763 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 84,440 points. Launch price was $7,890.

Xeon w9-3495X

The Xeon w9-3495X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 105 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 90,441 points. Launch price was $5,889.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7763 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon w9-3495X offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the EPYC 7763 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7763 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3495X — a 31.3% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3495X (base: 2.45 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The EPYC 7763 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon w9-3495X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7763 scores 84,440 against the Xeon w9-3495X's 90,441 — a 6.9% lead for the Xeon w9-3495X. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7763 vs 105 MB on the Xeon w9-3495X.

Feature	EPYC 7763	Xeon w9-3495X
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+14%	56 / 112
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	4.8 GHz+37%
Base Clock	2.45 GHz+29%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+144%	105 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm+	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	84,440	90,441+7%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	72,560
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,136
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	18,600

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7763 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3495X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7763 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3495X — the Xeon w9-3495X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7763) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3495X) — the EPYC 7763 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7763) and W790 (Xeon w9-3495X).

Feature	EPYC 7763	Xeon w9-3495X
Socket	SP3	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	DDR5-4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w9-3495X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7763) vs true (Xeon w9-3495X). Primary use case: Xeon w9-3495X targets Ultimate Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7763 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon w9-3495X rivals Threadripper PRO 7995WX.

Feature	EPYC 7763	Xeon w9-3495X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV	true
Target Use	—	Ultimate Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7763 was priced at $7890, while the Xeon w9-3495X came in at $5889. On launch pricing ($7890 vs $5889), Xeon w9-3495X was $2001 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7763 delivers 10.7 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3495X — making the Xeon w9-3495X the 35.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7763	Xeon w9-3495X
MSRP	$7890	$5889-25%
Performance per Dollar	10.7	15.4+44%
Release Date	2021	2023

Search EPYC 7763 on Amazon

Search Xeon w9-3495X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.