EPYC 7763 vs Xeon Max 9480
EPYC 7763
Xeon Max 9480
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7763
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Max 9480
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7763 | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($1,513) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($12,980) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+) | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7763 | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+774%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($1,513) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($12,980) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7763 and Xeon Max 9480
EPYC 7763
The EPYC 7763 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 84,440 points. Launch price was $7,890.
Xeon Max 9480
The Xeon Max 9480 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,913 points. Launch price was $12,980.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7763 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon Max 9480 offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the EPYC 7763 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7763 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Max 9480 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.45 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The EPYC 7763 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Max 9480 uses Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7763 scores 84,440 against the Xeon Max 9480's 82,913 — a 1.8% lead for the EPYC 7763. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7763 vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon Max 9480.
| Feature | EPYC 7763 | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+14% | 56 / 112 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.45 GHz+29% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+128% | 112.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm+-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) |
| PassMark | 84,440+2% | 82,913 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 55,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7763 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Max 9480 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7763 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Max 9480 — the EPYC 7763 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7763) vs 80 (Xeon Max 9480) — the EPYC 7763 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7763) and C741 (Xeon Max 9480).
| Feature | EPYC 7763 | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+63900% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Max 9480 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7763) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Max 9480). Primary use case: Xeon Max 9480 targets HPC Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7763 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon Max 9480 rivals EPYC 9684X.
| Feature | EPYC 7763 | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | HPC Server |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7763 launched at $7890 MSRP, while the Xeon Max 9480 debuted at $12980. At current prices ($1513 vs $12980), the EPYC 7763 is $11467 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7763 delivers 55.8 pts/$ vs 6.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Max 9480 — making the EPYC 7763 the 158.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7763 | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7890-39% | $12980 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1513-88% | $12980 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.8+772% | 6.4 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7763 and Xeon Max 9480
