EPYC 9275F
EPYC 9374F
EPYC 9275F vs EPYC 9374F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9275F vs EPYC 9374F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9275F vs EPYC 9374F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9275F
2024Why buy it
- ✅+3.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,411 less on MSRP ($3,439 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($3,439 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9374F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
EPYC 9374F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (82,009 vs 84,620).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($4,850 MSRP vs $3,439 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9275F better than EPYC 9374F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9275F vs EPYC 9374F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9275F
The EPYC 9275F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,620 points. Launch price was $3,439.
EPYC 9374F
The EPYC 9374F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,009 points. Launch price was $4,850.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9275F packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 9374F offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9374F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9275F versus 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9374F — a 11% clock advantage for the EPYC 9275F (base: 4.1 GHz vs 3.85 GHz). The EPYC 9275F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9374F uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9275F scores 84,620 against the EPYC 9374F's 82,009 — a 3.1% lead for the EPYC 9275F. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | EPYC 9374F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+12% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz+6% | 3.85 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 84,620+3% | 82,009 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 6000 on the EPYC 9275F versus 4800 on the EPYC 9374F — the EPYC 9275F supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 6144 of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9275F) and SP5 (EPYC 9374F).
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | EPYC 9374F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6000+25% | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9275F rivals Xeon 6980P; EPYC 9374F rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | EPYC 9374F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9275F was priced at $3439, while the EPYC 9374F came in at $4850. On launch pricing ($3439 vs $4850), EPYC 9275F was $1411 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9275F delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 16.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9374F — making the EPYC 9275F the 37.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | EPYC 9374F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3439-29% | $4850 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.6+46% | 16.9 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9275F and EPYC 9374F
