Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 48 MB).
- ✅Costs $3,566 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 816.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 17.2 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (67,561 vs 68,643).
- ❌70.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 205W.
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
2021Why buy it
- ✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 350W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.2 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($3,995 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX better than Xeon Platinum 8352Y?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 67,561 points. Launch price was $1,649.
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
The Xeon Platinum 8352Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 68,643 points. Launch price was $3,995.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8352Y has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — a 45.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX (base: 4.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is built on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX scores 67,561 against the Xeon Platinum 8352Y's 68,643 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8352Y. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX vs 48 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+59% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz+105% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+33% | 48 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Shimada Peak (2025) | — |
| PassMark | 67,561 | 68,643+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 40,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,016 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 23,596 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8352Y supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352Y) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX90 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352Y).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+100% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4096 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8352Y). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX rivals Xeon w7-3555; Xeon Platinum 8352Y rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX was priced at $429, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y came in at $3995. On launch pricing ($429 vs $3995), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX was $3566 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX delivers 157.5 pts/$ vs 17.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX the 160.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429-89% | $3995 |
| Performance per Dollar | 157.5+816% | 17.2 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX and Xeon Platinum 8352Y
