EPYC 4585PX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

AMD

EPYC 4585PX

16 Cores32 Thrd170 WWMax: 5.7 GHz2025
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

16 Cores32 Thrd350 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

EPYC 4585PX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4585PX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4585PX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4585PX

2025

Why buy it

  • +4.4% higher PassMark.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Draws 170W instead of 350W, a 180W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 100.9 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

2025

Why buy it

  • Costs $270 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 56.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • 357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (67,561 vs 70,563).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
  • 105.9% higher power demand at 350W vs 170W.
  • No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4585PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4585PX better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4585PX pulls ahead with 4.4% better PassMark. EPYC 4585PX also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4585PX is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.4% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 4585PX is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 4585PX comes in 62.9% more expensive on MSRP at $699 MSRP versus $429 MSRP, and it still gives you 4.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is also 56.0% better value on MSRP (157.5 vs 100.9 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4585PX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 4585PX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 4585PX

The EPYC 4585PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 70,563 points. Launch price was $699.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 67,561 points. Launch price was $1,649.

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 4585PX and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4585PX versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — a 5.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 4585PX (base: 4.3 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The EPYC 4585PX uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4585PX scores 70,563 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX's 67,561 — a 4.3% lead for the EPYC 4585PX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4585PX vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.

FeatureEPYC 4585PXRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
16 / 32
Boost Clock
5.7 GHz+6%
5.4 GHz
Base Clock
4.3 GHz
4.5 GHz+5%
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)+100%
64 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm
4 nm
Architecture
Grado (2025)
Shimada Peak (2025)
PassMark
70,563+4%
67,561
Cinebench R23 Multi
40,000
Geekbench 6 Single
3,016
Geekbench 6 Multi
23,596
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4585PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4585PX versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4585PX) and WRX90 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX).

FeatureEPYC 4585PXRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Socket
AM5
sTR5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
5600
DDR5-6400+14%
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
2048 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
28
128+357%
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4585PX) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). The EPYC 4585PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4585PX rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX rivals Xeon w7-3555.

FeatureEPYC 4585PXRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon Graphics
None
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
true
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4585PX was priced at $699, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX came in at $429. On launch pricing ($699 vs $429), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX was $270 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4585PX delivers 100.9 pts/$ vs 157.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX the 43.8% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 4585PXRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
MSRP
$699
$429-39%
Performance per Dollar
100.9
157.5+56%
Release Date
2025
2025

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.