EPYC 4585PX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

AMD

EPYC 4585PX

16 Cores32 Thrd170 WWMax: 5.7 GHz2025

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

16 Cores32 Thrd350 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 4585PX

2025

Why buy it

  • +4.4% higher PassMark.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Draws 170W instead of 350W, a 180W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 100.9 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

2025

Why buy it

  • Costs $270 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 56.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • 357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (67,561 vs 70,563).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
  • 105.9% higher power demand at 350W vs 170W.
  • No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4585PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4585PX better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is ahead with a 1.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4585PX pulls ahead with 4.4% better PassMark. EPYC 4585PX also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4585PX is the better fit. You are getting 4.4% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 4585PX is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 4585PX is 62.9% more expensive on MSRP at $699 MSRP versus $429 MSRP, and it gives you 4.4% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is also 56.0% better value on MSRP (157.5 vs 100.9 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4585PX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 4585PXRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
1080p
low300 FPS297 FPS
medium274 FPS270 FPS
high227 FPS223 FPS
ultra191 FPS188 FPS
1440p
low276 FPS273 FPS
medium228 FPS224 FPS
high177 FPS174 FPS
ultra156 FPS153 FPS
4K
low190 FPS187 FPS
medium156 FPS154 FPS
high120 FPS118 FPS
ultra106 FPS104 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 4585PXRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
1080p
low722 FPS781 FPS
medium615 FPS642 FPS
high457 FPS476 FPS
ultra385 FPS402 FPS
1440p
low591 FPS641 FPS
medium524 FPS546 FPS
high405 FPS420 FPS
ultra319 FPS326 FPS
4K
low332 FPS360 FPS
medium299 FPS310 FPS
high262 FPS271 FPS
ultra224 FPS228 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 4585PXRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
1080p
low893 FPS888 FPS
medium725 FPS705 FPS
high652 FPS622 FPS
ultra560 FPS534 FPS
1440p
low720 FPS713 FPS
medium585 FPS567 FPS
high514 FPS489 FPS
ultra437 FPS414 FPS
4K
low516 FPS507 FPS
medium431 FPS418 FPS
high387 FPS375 FPS
ultra322 FPS315 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 4585PXRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
1080p
low1116 FPS1106 FPS
medium1001 FPS991 FPS
high878 FPS867 FPS
ultra792 FPS781 FPS
1440p
low872 FPS860 FPS
medium766 FPS759 FPS
high673 FPS664 FPS
ultra584 FPS576 FPS
4K
low637 FPS632 FPS
medium566 FPS562 FPS
high503 FPS496 FPS
ultra435 FPS429 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4585PX and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

AMD

EPYC 4585PX

The EPYC 4585PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 70,563 points. Launch price was $699.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 67,561 points. Launch price was $1,649.

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 4585PX and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4585PX versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — a 5.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 4585PX (base: 4.3 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The EPYC 4585PX uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4585PX scores 70,563 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX's 67,561 — a 4.3% lead for the EPYC 4585PX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4585PX vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.

FeatureEPYC 4585PXRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
16 / 32
Boost Clock
5.7 GHz+6%
5.4 GHz
Base Clock
4.3 GHz
4.5 GHz+5%
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)+100%
64 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm
4 nm
Architecture
Grado (2025)
Shimada Peak (2025)
PassMark
70,563+4%
67,561
Cinebench R23 Multi
40,000
Geekbench 6 Single
3,016
Geekbench 6 Multi
23,596
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4585PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4585PX versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — the EPYC 4585PX supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 256 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4585PX) and WRX90 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX).

FeatureEPYC 4585PXRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Socket
AM5
sTR5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
5600+111900%
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
256
2048 GB+838860700%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
28
128+357%
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4585PX) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). The EPYC 4585PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4585PX rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX rivals Xeon w7-3555.

FeatureEPYC 4585PXRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon Graphics
None
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
true
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 4585PX launched at $699 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX debuted at $429. On MSRP ($699 vs $429), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is $270 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4585PX delivers 100.9 pts/$ vs 157.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX the 43.8% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 4585PXRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
MSRP
$699
$429-39%
Performance per Dollar
100.9
157.5+56%
Release Date
2025
2025