
EPYC 4585PX
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4585PX
2025Why buy it
- ✅+4.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 350W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 100.9 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 56.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (67,561 vs 70,563).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌105.9% higher power demand at 350W vs 170W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4585PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
EPYC 4585PX
2025Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅+4.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 350W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 56.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 100.9 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (67,561 vs 70,563).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌105.9% higher power demand at 350W vs 170W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4585PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4585PX better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4585PX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 227 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 104 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4585PX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 722 FPS | 781 FPS |
| medium | 615 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 457 FPS | 476 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 402 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 641 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 228 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4585PX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 893 FPS | 888 FPS |
| medium | 725 FPS | 705 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 560 FPS | 534 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 489 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 387 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4585PX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1116 FPS | 1106 FPS |
| medium | 1001 FPS | 991 FPS |
| high | 878 FPS | 867 FPS |
| ultra | 792 FPS | 781 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 872 FPS | 860 FPS |
| medium | 766 FPS | 759 FPS |
| high | 673 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 584 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 637 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 503 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 429 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4585PX and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

EPYC 4585PX
EPYC 4585PX
The EPYC 4585PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 70,563 points. Launch price was $699.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 67,561 points. Launch price was $1,649.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 4585PX and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4585PX versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — a 5.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 4585PX (base: 4.3 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The EPYC 4585PX uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4585PX scores 70,563 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX's 67,561 — a 4.3% lead for the EPYC 4585PX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4585PX vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+6% | 5.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.5 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+100% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 70,563+4% | 67,561 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 40,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,016 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 23,596 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4585PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4585PX versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — the EPYC 4585PX supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 256 — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4585PX) and WRX90 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX).
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+111900% | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 2048 GB+838860700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4585PX) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). The EPYC 4585PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4585PX rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX rivals Xeon w7-3555.
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | true |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4585PX launched at $699 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX debuted at $429. On MSRP ($699 vs $429), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is $270 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4585PX delivers 100.9 pts/$ vs 157.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX the 43.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $429-39% |
| Performance per Dollar | 100.9 | 157.5+56% |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












